Stephen T. Reid is a young man diligent to know and proclaim the truth of God’s Word. He lives with his family in Columbus, OH.
Chapter 1: Introduction
The author introduces the controversy over Bible translations and the need to determine which version is truly God’s Word. He argues that the King James Version is the most reliable, based on Scriptural reasoning.
Chapter 2: Why It Matters and Prerequisite Beliefs
The author outlines foundational truths about the Word of God that must be understood before examining the issue of Bible versions. This includes God’s promise to preserve His Word, and the importance of Scripture for faith and spiritual weapons.
Chapter 3: Satan’s Warfare Against the Word of God
The author argues that Satan seeks to corrupt and undermine God’s Word through false and distorted Bible versions. This chapter examines Satan’s strategy in tempting Eve by distorting God’s command.
Chapter 4: Do All Versions Say the Same Thing?
The author provides numerous examples showing how modern versions differ significantly from the King James Version in degrading God’s nature, downplaying Christ’s deity, and making other changes.
Chapter 5: Do the Differences Matter?
The author argues that the differences between Bible versions are not minor but change substantial meanings. These differences matter due to Scripture’s central role in faith.
Chapter 6: Are Modern Versions Easier to Understand?
The author discusses claims that modern versions are easier to understand, but argues that the King James Version is ultimately superior and more faithful to God’s intent despite using older English.
Chapter 7: Why So Many Modern Versions?
The author attributes the proliferation of modern Bible versions to Satan’s efforts to corrupt and subvert God’s Word. He notes warnings against adding to or subtracting from Scripture.
Chapter 8: Why Trust the KJV over Scholar’s Interpretations?
The author argues that faith in God’s promise to preserve His Word, coupled with the superior accuracy of the KJV, allows one to have confidence in it over scholarly interpretations of the original languages.
Chapter 9: Why So Few Trust the KJV
The author cites reasons like deception, human will and the unpopularity of truth to explain why few embrace the King James Version despite its superiority.
Chapter 10: Conclusion
The author summarizes the key points made and encourages readers to decide for themselves what they believe based on thoughtful Bible study.
The key features of the author’s approach are:
- Establishing theological premises based on Scripture: The author begins by establishing several foundational beliefs about the Word of God based on numerous Bible verses. These premises lay the groundwork for the rest of his arguments.
- Applying the premises to the version controversy: The author then seeks to show how these Biblical truths and premises, if properly applied, point to the King James Version as God’s preserved Word for English speakers today.
- Providing examples and evidence: The author supports his conclusion by citing numerous examples that demonstrate the superiority of the KJV compared to modern versions. These include textual comparisons, word removals, doctrinal issues and more.
- Reasoning from specific examples to general conclusions: The author presents many specific examples as evidence but then reasons from those to broader conclusions about the trustworthiness of the KJV versus modern versions in general.
- Logical progression of arguments: The author’s points build logically upon one another in a deductive chain of reasoning, with each chapter forming part of the complete argument.
- Seeking to undermine competing views: The author seeks to undermine claims made in favor of modern versions by showing how they contradict Scripture, logic or the textual evidence.
The author uses a structured, logical, evidence-based style of reasoning that begins with Biblical premises and seeks to deduce conclusions about the Bible version controversy from them. His arguments follow a linear, deductive flow aimed at building a compelling case in favor of the King James Version.